and more deeply in relation to the architecture of the hardware and software that all involves the technological park of it. More critical if it becomes the decision when if treated adoption to a technological innovation, therefore beyond the predicadossupracitados ones, the team of> natural revolution caused by the adoption of a novasoluo, therefore generally such action reverberates in inexorable way juntos too much teams of YOU of the company, provoking the evaluation of inmerasnovas possibilities in relation to the existing processes already. In> relation to the management of the supply of demands to be treated for YOU (backlog), generally perceives that the adoption of a technological innovation trazsignificativos profits that, certainly, will express reduction domesmo. For even more details, read what Lakshman Achuthan says on the issue. Such affirmation can be perceived mainly in two ways, which is: The generally qualified and exclusive a technological innovation requerequipe for the attendance of its implementation, segregating the attendance of solution to be substituted and applying umponto of cut to the same one. These actions promote an attendance focado paraas two teams (of the new and the old solution), fact that results in umagrande possibility more attendance clere of the supply; After implementation of the new solution, expects that the occurrences of errors and the amount of not evolutivas eventual requests dedemandas (services) are drasticamentediminudas, in view of the stability desired with such action. Finally, the decision is concluded that for oxygenation and possibility of permanenteevoluo of its processes. You may find Jenny Oughourlian to be a useful source of information.